Common Foundation Programme - Moving and Handling
A guide to the Moving and Handling sessions in the Common Foundation Programme (module 2) for both staff and students.
Moving and handling home page | FHHS Intranet home page
Session 2 - Ergonomics and Risk Assessment
Ergonomics
Introduction to ergonomic theory
All students have undertaken an Ergonomic Practical Session with the Physiology Laboratory
This has identified the flexibility and strength of the spine and body and considered the following individual differences:
Relevance of muscle strength
Body Build
Height
Weight
We must be aware of the following issues in relation to moving and handling in the caring environment:
There is an inherent risk of injury for people who are involved in the regular handling of loads.
As a carer, your most common load will probably be people.
For numerous obvious reasons, people are amongst the most difficult and demanding of all loads.
In fact as a carer you are more at risk from injury caused by manual handling than people in any other occupation.
The following charts highlight exactly how many nurses have been injured.
Handling and Injury (source: Health & Safety Executive, 1992)
Pressure put on the spinal cord is called the load, the increase in load will depend on the position of your body.
It is therefore important that we consider our posture at all times for the health of our spine but especially when we are moving the patients.
We can see from the following graph how position can alter the load.
Click here to
see the forces involved explained.
Click
here for details of back pain.
Primary
Results from the damage to the soft tissue around the spine from:
Trauma
Fatigue
Pathological changes
Postural stresses
Secondary
Results from interference with the spine nerves, from:
Pressure from the disc on the nerve
Osteophytes, from the vertebrae
Referred
Pain originates not in the spine but in the pelvis, or abdomen, which have the same segmental nerve supply.
The spine is still growing and developing up to around the age of eighteen. Up to this point both the spine and the general musculature are usually unfamiliar with the stresses and strains of prolonged manual work.
As we get older, other factors come into play. Whilst the spine is fully developed once people reach adulthood, the ageing process continues and can precipitate weakness both in the skeleton and musculature. Usually, after the age of fifty five, the average level of degeneration in the skeleton significantly increases the risk of injury during manual handling.
Chemical and biolgical factors
Smoking - has been linked to increased degeneration in the vertebral discs.
Steroids - can cause long term weakening of the musculo skeletal system.
Drugs/alcohol - which induce either muscular relaxation or tension.
Menstruation - causes a hormone imbalance which can lead to increased stress and tension.
Pregnancy - induces hormone imbalance and alteration of ligaments, cartilages and muscle tension.
increases in weight
relaxation of ligaments surrounding the pelvis
Menopause - the hormonal imbalance can cause osteoporosis which weakens the musculo skeletal system
The spinal column is composed of 33 protective
vertebrae, providing attachments for ligaments, muscles and ribs.
Click here for further details of the spinal
column.
The spinal column and cord components are a unique design. For good posture, the spine needs to be maintained in normal alignment. The following movements should be avoided:
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Forward bending | Side bending | Rotating | Extending |
These are examples of not keeping the body in normal alignment.
Persistent poor posture, pushing and handling loads incorrectly will eventually damage the spine.
The function of the disc is to act as a "shock absorber".
If the pressure on the disc is too great it will herniate - pain may be felt and nerves trapped.
Click
here to see examples of disc herniation.
Risk Assessment
Firstly, assessing risk means being aware of the problem areas. It then helps determine how concerned you need to be about the problem. For instance, does it place many staff at risk? Is the problem met frequently or rarely? Is it likely to cause a major injury, or could it be one of the many tasks where each time it is carried out it contributes to cumulative strain? But a risk assessment is useless unless it leads to action on reducing risks. This could be an immediate decision to change a simple work practice, or it could be the basis for budgeting over several years to purchase a large number of handling aids.
Why do risk assessments? - THE REGULATIONS REQUIRE IT!
The Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992 require risk assessments to be carried out if the employer cannot avoid the need for a manual handling which involves a risk of injury. Once assessments are made, the employer must take appropriate steps to reduce the risk of injury to the lowest level reasonably practicable. "Reasonably practicable" means reducing the risk until the cost of any further precautions - in time, trouble or money - would far outweigh the benefits.
Click here for further details about risk assessment.
There are three levels of assessments:
Assessments should be developed so that the patient care plan contains clear information on the patients movement, abilities and needs. Where necessary to include specific instructions for the use of lifting aids.
An assessment at ward level only needs to be done occasionally (annually).
Whenever senior management considers the requirements of the organisation:
An example of a Risk Assessment tool
RULA:
This assessment method was developed by Ms Lynn McAtamney, Institute of Occupational Ergonomics, University of Nottingham.
This method of observation is broken down into a number of key areas; upper arms, lower arms, wrists and neck twist, trunk, leg muscle use and forces or load score.
A variety of different scores are given depending on the angle of bend, the angle of twist, loads or forces applied and muscles use either static or repetitive.
T
ask Individual Capability LoadWorking
EnvironmentWe often refer to
TILEAsymmetrical?
Unstable or could move suddenly?
Texture/temperature/sharp corners?
Difficult to grasp?
Holding Loads away from the body?
Twisting and/or stopping?
Reaching upwards?
Large vertical movement (eg floor to overhead)?
Long carrying, pushing, hand/limb position grip?
Fatiguing, strenuous?
Restrictions on posture from clothing/uniform?
DURATION, FREQUENCY AND JOB DESIGN
How long, how often?
Fixed, static work
Repetitive? Forced pace?
Sufficient rest or recovery time?
Are there other tasks the worker does which may load him/her further?
Is the task always done by the same worker / is there job rotation?
Enough room to move freely in good posture?
Provision for alternative working positions/seats?
Machinery/workbench at a convenient height?
Is the floor slippery/uneven/littered?
Lighting adequate?
Too hot, too cold, draughty?
RCN Guide 1996CLIENT HANDLING CRITERIA WILL ALWAYS TAKE INTO ACCOUNT |
WHEN CONSIDERING WAYS IN WHICH A CLIENT MAY BE INJURED DURING A TECHNIQUE THERE ARE FOUR MAIN POINTS: |
Just Suppose:
For 6 dependent patients
Total weight moved is 6,720lbs
or
3 tons
or
120 sacks of potatoes
IS THIS REASONABLE?
Moving and handling home page | FHHS Intranet home page
These pages have been prepared by Colin Baker, Safety Co-ordinator.